Search for: "Mark May"
Results 1 - 20
of 65,362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2017, 1:32 am
This requires that the owner make genuine use of the mark, rather than merely token use for the sole purpose of preserving the mark, and also that the trade mark was used as a trade mark. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 7:43 am
” The post Contractors May Include Third-Party Restrictive Markings on Unlimited Rights Data appeared first on Government Contracts Legal Forum. [read post]
23 May 2020, 9:15 am
A single alphabet letter mark may face a bigger challenge in some jurisdictions than others. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 2:05 pm
The post Mark Kemp Investor Alert: Potential Compensation Claims May Be Available appeared first on Experienced Investor Lawyers. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 2:05 pm
The post Mark Kemp Investor Alert: Potential Compensation Claims May Be Available appeared first on Experienced Investor Lawyers. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 2:05 pm
The post Mark Kemp Investor Alert: Potential Compensation Claims May Be Available appeared first on Experienced Investor Lawyers. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:17 am
Thus, the plaintiff in a reverse passing off case must plead and prove only that the work “originated with” him -- not that he used the work (which may or may not be associated with a mark) in U.S. commerce. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 2:06 pm
You may also be interested in Patent Marking. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:00 am
Under the false marking statute (35 USC 292), a patentee may be liable up to $500 per falsely marked product. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 10:40 am
But in the case of products which consumption may not be in the best interests of consumers, such as tobacco, alcohol, or even sodas and other sugared treats, the marks and the logos also serve as a seductive lure. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
Armed with actual documentation that a product was falsely marked, a court may draw an inference of the defendant's knowledge simply by the finite nature of patents and the ordeal an entity must go through to actively create and maintain a patent. . . . [read post]
15 May 2017, 8:28 am
Statement of the Chief Prosecutor 13 May 2017 Final (PDF)Statement of the Chief Prosecutor 13 May 2017 Final (Text) [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 8:19 am
And that misrepresentation must relate to or affect the company's securities.Failing to disclose a material fact could be a violation, if it misled investors.However, it remains to be seen if this allegation, of different standards for different users, rises to a level of a material misrepresentation that misled investors and the value of the stock.https://www.rawstory.com/why-facebook-s-mark-zuckerberg-may-be-in-hot-water-with-the-sec/ [read post]
23 May 2023, 8:42 am
“These other parties may own applications or registrations, or they may have common law rights in the mark but no application or registration. [read post]
25 May 2009, 8:00 pm
Mark to market, or... [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 1:04 am
It may be that a receiver would eventually be able to sell the trade marks but the course of doing so would or might well be fraught with considerable difficulty and delay. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 1:45 am
“News of undercover policeman Mark Kennedy’s sexual relationships with environmental activists has fuelled speculation about the possibility of civil lawsuits, as experts say there may be legal grounds for action. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:36 pm
Based on information received from a Freedom of Information Act request, during the time period of May to December 2010, the U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:11 am
This poses a challenge for current PMA applicants who may be faced with the choice of delaying a PMA application until after April 2011 in order to take advantage of the new (more limited) marking requirements. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
The owner of the domain's is Douglas Nicoll, his company buys unused pressure gauges from the US government and sells them on.ITT claimed that the use of their marks as domain names was an infringement of their trade marks (they have over 700 registered marks across the globe) and argued the Mr Nicoll has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain names. [read post]
