Search for: "Mark May"
Results 81 - 100
of 65,346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2009, 5:09 pm
The false markings were on the packaging, not on the product, even though it would have been feasible to mark the product itselfâ€â [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
If, however, some of the trade marks in the series which have not been used for some reason do not satisfy the section 46(2) test then the registration of those trade marks may be revoked. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:48 pm
Fans of Maker’s Mark may want to raise their glasses to this one– the signature red wax dripping that seals each bottle of the Kentucky bourbon was recently recognized as a distinctive, enforceable trademark. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
These penalties have spawned a wave of false marking lawsuits by individuals who hope to collect from companies who mark products with incorrect patent numbers or numbers of expired patents. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:26 am
In Coca-Cola Co v All-Fect Distributors Ltd [1999] FCA 1721, [19], the Full Bench of the Federal Court held: Use ‘as a trade mark’ is use of the mark as a ‘badge of origin’ in the sense that it indicates a connection in the course of trade between goods and the person who applies the mark to the goods ... [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 1:59 pm
Many may recall an incident that occurred in April 2016, under the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC). [read post]
27 May 2020, 5:14 am
Some may equate it with hugs and kisses, others may immediately think to follow it up with “…Gossip Girl” [*slowly raises hand*], some may recall the US fashion brand, and those who have been stuck on the video streaming services for perhaps a bit too long may come up with the Netflix original film of the same name [not this Kat though - Google brought it up, I swear]. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 12:25 pm
The Times today carries an interview with President of the Family Division Sir Mark Potter. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:49 am
Oliver Morris suggested that, again broadly speaking, patent cases may be harder factually but easier from a legal perspective (and vice versa for trade marks etc).Should there be a parody defence for trade mark infringement? [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:55 am
There are several reasons that the USPTO may refuse to register your trademark. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:50 am
To contact Mark directly, you may email him at mpayne@wlpplaw.com. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:32 pm
Chicago Partner Mark Spognardi will be speaking to the Illinois CPA Society on May 18 in Northbrook. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 5:51 am
If your mark was once distinctive, but if it is now found to be generic, you may lose your exclusive rights. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 5:26 am
On December 28 the Federal Circuit issued a decision that may greatly stimulate the activities of what are already being called "marking trolls". [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Is the meaning of the marks one that may disparage Native Americans? [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 3:01 am
Are trade marks property that may be forfeited? [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:19 am
The Stanley Works, 1-10-cv-01175 (ILND May 12, 2010, Memorandum Order) (Shadur, J.) [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 7:52 am
Algorithms may, however, be too dynamic and cause legal problems, as the case discussed below shows. [read post]
28 May 2009, 3:52 am
In Daimler AG v Sany Group Company Ltd [2009] EWHC 1003 (Ch) (14 May 2009) the registered proprietor of the following marks sought injunctions and other relief against Sany Group Co. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
As the USPTO points out, "Only one mark is permissible per application, although a mark may consist of several elements that are joined to form a composite whole (e.g., words plus a design). [read post]
