Search for: "Mark S Diamond" Results 81 - 100 of 623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2018, 10:00 pm
Under U.S. law, secondary meaning is required to show a mark is distinctive of a product’s source when the mark, as here, constitutes the design of the product. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
No double diamond infringement for Umbro – but was its logo harmed by being too closely associated with the brand name? [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:30 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
    Exclamation Mark:  A red diamond with an explanation mark is to warn employees the product can be an irritant (skin or eye), skin sensitizer, acute toxicity (harmful), narcotic effects, respiratory tract irritant, hazardous to the ozone layer (non-mandatory). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 1:04 pm by Steve Hall
Mary's Cathedral was aglow in downtown Austin, marking the Roman Catholic Church's censure of capital punishment. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 12:00 am
Thanks to one of his guest posters, here are the Oscar nominees: ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE Leonardo DiCaprio – BLOOD DIAMOND Ryan Gosling – HALF NELSON Peter O'Toole – VENUS Will Smith – THE PURSUIT OF HAPPYNESS Forest Whitaker – THE LAST KING OF SCOTLAND ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE Alan Arkin – LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE Jackie Earle Haley – LITTLE CHILDREN Djimon Hounsou – BLOOD DIAMOND Eddie Murphy – DREAMGIRLS … [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 3:43 am
" The CAFC found that substantial evidence supported the Board's decision. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 9:34 pm
In support of Respondent's argument that the disputed domain name is not confusingly similar to Complainants' marks, she relied heavily on the nature of her luxury pet boutique website. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:31 am
  December 3, 2015 - 2:40 PM: In re The Hyman Companies, Inc., Serial No. 85483397 [Section 2(a) refusal of the mark DIAMONDESS for "jewelry primarily composed of simulated diamonds and gemstones" on the ground of deceptiveness].December 8, 2015 - 2 PM: Royal Crown Company, Inc. and Dr. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:55 am
Here's the unusual case where consumer ignorance prevents infringement, because consumers don't recognize the existence of a mark. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 9:58 am by Stephen Bilkis
Diamond v Diamond Diamonte, 57 AD3d 826, 869 NYS2d 609 [2d Dept 2007] [plaintiff failed to appear ready to proceed for two successive court dates during the trial-in-chief, when she was scheduled to undergo cross examination; on the second occasion, which was marked “final” by the court, she was outside of the courthouse in her car and refused to enter the building. [read post]
As to liability, Costco raised triable issues of fact as to three likelihood of confusion factors—whether Costco’s customers were actually confused, whether Costco adopted Tiffany’s mark in bad faith, and whether the relevant population of consumers was sufficiently sophisticated to avoid confusion. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” Although “where the allegedly infringing mark is identical to the registered mark, and its use began subsequent to the plaintiff’s trade-mark registration, the defendant must carry the burden of explanation and persuasion,” it is still the case that “[p]rior knowledge of a senior user’s trade mark does not necessarily give rise to an inference of bad faith and may [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 3:14 am
The Board focused on opposer's registered mark THE BEAUTY CHANNEL as the mark most similar to applicant's mark, noting that if confusion is not likely as to that mark, then there is no need to consider the other two registered marks (BEAUTY EVERYWHERE and SYNCHRONIZING BEAUTY).The Board first found that applicant's services (providing information about beauty) encompassed those of opposer. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 3:30 am
” “The fact that color is not claimed as a feature of Diamond Hong’s mark . . . further highlights the likelihood of confusion because, as the TTAB correctly identified, Diamond Hong’s mark “could be presented in a green and- white color scheme like [Mr. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 10:34 pm
Next Tuesday, 12 June, is CLT's one-day event, The Essential Trade Mark Conference (here's the programme). [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Payne, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Saturday, December 24, 2022 Editor's Note: Eric Diamond, Donald Crawshaw, and Sarah P. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Payne, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Saturday, December 24, 2022 Editor's Note: Eric Diamond, Donald Crawshaw, and Sarah P. [read post]