Search for: "Mark S Rogers"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
By Mark S. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
It’s going to be, no, he’s not going out easy. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm
Rather, the Court relied on case-law showing that where the use of a mark is “at least in part” for the purposes of source identification, Rogers has no proper role, even if the defendant is also “making an expressive comment” by way of its use. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Inside the GOP Presidential Candidate Gift Card Ploy Turning Campaign Finance Upside Down MSN – Roger Sollenberger (Daily Beast) | Published: 7/13/2023 The Republican National Committee requires at least 40,000 individual donors as one of its criteria for allowing a candidate on the stage for the first presidential debate in August. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 5:53 am
What’s the Future of the Rogers Test? [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
The Guardian and BBC also report a demonstration at the Osbourne-Rogers wedding which Just Stop Oil has stated was not organised by them. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
Dobrinsky, Carlos Jimenez, Mark B. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:35 am
Maggie Astor and Katie Rogers report for the New York Times. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:35 am
Maggie Astor and Katie Rogers report for the New York Times. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
Then the police officers would go out and arrest the marks. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:34 am
The district court found that VIP’s use of Jack Daniel’s trademarks was likely to confuse consumers, infringed Jack Daniel’s marks, and tarnished Jack Daniel’s reputation. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 1:22 pm
Mark Nevitt discussed the legal crisis within the climate crisis. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
Does the Roger’s Exclusion Still Apply? [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:39 am
What about trade marks? [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:11 am
Specifically, Diece-Lisa argued a “reverse confusion theory,” alleging that Disney’s Lots-o’-Huggin’ Bear flooded the toy market and swallowed Diece-Lisa’s mark, thereby confusing consumers into thinking the “Lots of Hugs” mark came from Disney. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:13 am
VIP Products to uses of another’s mark within an expressive work that do not designate the source of the accused infringer’s products. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
If another’s mark is used within the title or content of an expressive work, the Rogers test prevents a finding of infringement under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:49 pm
Anderson, Anna Bower, Hyemin Han, Tyler McBrien, Roger Parloff, Stephanie Pell, Katherine Pompilio, Alan Z. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
