Search for: "Mark Strong"
Results 161 - 180
of 10,706
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2009, 8:24 am
In 1997, Mark Speranza deposited a number of semen... [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 2:30 pm
This week marks the 10 year anniversary of the BC Injury Law Blog. 2,374 posts strong! [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:16 pm
The key to getting a strong recovery... [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 4:03 pm
IN THE MAIL: From Mark Rippetoe (author of Starting Strength, which many readers praised when I mentioned it a while back) Strong Enough? [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
The Packers might have a case, but not a very strong one. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:52 pm
The truth is, they’re not very strong. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 3:22 am
It found some marks not famous but relatively strong, some marks weak, etc. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 6:19 am
Lesson for Practice – Attention to Detail and Continued Client-Communications Can Prevent Costly Mistakes This case is strong evidence of the need to educate clients and patent owners on the statutory marking requirements. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 1:59 pm
Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, and Mark Warner, D-Va. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 6:40 pm
Following up on my earlier posts today, I have briefly perused the human rights complaints filed against Mark Steyn and Macleans, and have a few top line thoughts, only.Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms specifically guarantees freedom of the press. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:16 am
The Board found opposer's mark PYRAT to be conceptually strong, but there was no evidence to support opposer's claim that it is commercially strong. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:29 am
It looks into both the Trade Marks Directive and the Regulation and brings both EUTMs and national trade marks into the discussion. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 2:54 pm
This week, EFF joined over 5,600 individuals in a letter (PDF) pressing the Senate for meaningful patent reform—reform that goes beyond the current Senate proposals and provides strong fixes to the patent troll problem. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:02 pm
The author notes that this principle would appear to apply only to proposed use word marks, not design marks where there would be limited, if any, deviation between the mark as registered vs. the mark as used. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:12 am
Expired patent is not strong evidence of (2), but it’s good evidence of (1). [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 5:31 am
She showed more leadership in this case than she has in years on the court; her majority opinion was strong. [read post]
29 Oct 2006, 12:09 pm
And so the Board found GOYA to be "strong and distinctive. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 8:23 am
Congressional Democrats recently proposed a reform bill in the Senate that would mark the first comprehensive overhaul of U.S. pesticide rules since 1996. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 10:59 am
The Legal Theory Bookworm recommends Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law by Mark Tushnet. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 4:18 am
Likelihood of confusion:The Board found the “S” shield marks to be inherently/conceptually strong and also commercially strong or famous, and therefore entitled to a broad scope of protection. [read post]
