Search for: "Marks v. Colvin"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2015, 7:08 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., August 3, 2015) (affirming denial of disability insurance benefits)Workers CompensationMartinez v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 5:29 pm
Colvin (10thCir., December 14, 2015) (affirming denial of social security benefits, based upon the ALJ’s credibility determination)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 10:58 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., September 24, 2015) (reversing district court affirmation of the ALJ’s denial of social security benefits to Trujillo)Flowell Electric Association, Inc., v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 9:35 pm
Discrimination & Retaliation*Cink v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:23 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., July 20, 2016) (affirming denial ofreview of ALJ determination that Ray was not impaired, as Ray failed to showany basis for reversal)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 6:11 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., August 10, 2016) (affirming denial of attorneys' fees, but reversing the district court's order dismissing Ridgell-Boltz's hostile-work-environment claim)*Chung v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 9:48 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., May 26, 2016) (reversing denial of disability benefits because the administrative law judge improperly ignored a relevant medical opinion without justification)Workplace Violence/Weapons*Kerkhoff v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 1:09 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., April 4, 2016) (reversing judgment in favor of Commissioner because the ALJ failed to properly evaluate consulting psychologist's opinion)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 8:15 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., December 10, 2015) (affirming denial of disability insurance benefits)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
21 May 2016, 2:51 am
Colvin (10th Cir., May 9, 2016) (affirming ALJ determination that Smith was not disabled)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 9:19 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., September 14, 2015) (affirming denial of Smith’s application for disability benefits and supplemental security income)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 7:21 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., June 2, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits: the administrative law judge's reasons for discounting the relevant medical opinions were neither insufficient nor illegitimate)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:26 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., May 20, 2016) (affirming denial of disability based upon Jones's failure to show inconsistent or insufficient evidence against the determination)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 1:21 am
Colvin (10th Cir., January 4, 2017) (reversing district court's upholding commissioner denial of disability benefits, because the ALJ's analysis failed in several particulars)Wrongful TerminationVogt v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 1:42 am
Colvin (10th Cir., January 24, 2017) (affirming denial of disability benefits because the ALJ properly evaluated both credibility and evidence; there was no error) *Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:20 pm
” [Prosecutor v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:04 pm
” [Prosecutor v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:04 pm
” [Prosecutor v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 5:50 am
ASW, LLC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:56 am
Wiesner, Mark R. [read post]
