Search for: "Marsh v. USA" Results 21 - 40 of 71
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2014, 4:30 am by Ashley Smith
Marsh, USA, Inc., the court was posed with the question: When an insurance broker shares a ‘special relationship’ with its client, is the broker subject to an extra-contractual enhanced duty of care requiring the broker to advise the client about the amount of coverage prudently needed to meet its complete insurance needs? [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:54 am by Tom Crane
 They became much more enforceable with the decision in Marsh USA Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Ruling that an employer could be vicariously liable on a tort claim by an individual who was injured in a vehicular collision with an employee after hours, a California appeals court found the “required vehicle” exception to the going and coming rule applicable (Moradi v Marsh USA, Inc, CalCtApp, September 17, 2013). [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 2:40 pm
This is a major expansion of employer liability.Maybe it's right. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm by John Elwood
DHL Express (USA), Inc., 12-747. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:10 pm by Andrew Wooley
 By Andrew Wooley           The Supreme Court of Texas’ recent decision in Marsh USA Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:10 pm by Liskow & Lewis
 By Andrew Wooley           The Supreme Court of Texas’ recent decision in Marsh USA Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 1:43 pm by Rand Zumwalt
Non-compete Agreements in Texas During the course of his employment at a certain company, an individual might come across valuable information or training not available to the general public. [read post]