Search for: "Martin et al v. Rogers"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
To give the reader some idea of the artificial flavor of Egilman’s pomposity, paragraph 8 of his remarkable declaration avers” “My views on the scientific standards for the determination of cause-effect relationships (medical epistemology) have been cited by the Massachusetts Supreme Court (Vassallo v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
Doughty Street Chambers has announced the sudden and unexpected death of leading media law silk, Heather Rogers KC. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am
Kreder, Jennifer Anglim et al. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm
Marigold et al v Wells (2023) UKUT 33 (LC) – Upper Tribunal on a reasonable excuse defence to a rent repayment order. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Chair, Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the… [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 3:00 am
Martin Cassidy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 3:40 pm
”1Chief Justice Roger B. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
He also marked the arraignment of Abd Al-Hadi Al-Iraqi and flagged Martins’ remarks on it. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Goldberg et al. eds., 2011), Reference Area(KF8205.A2 I535 2011). [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Martin, et al., New York Evidence Handbook 318 (2d ed. 2002)). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Wheelahan v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, et al. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 5:57 am
Le tandem Degrémont –Odebrecht avait tenu compte dans son offre initiale, de phases futures d’extension en options et serait ainsi bien placé pour remporter ce second marché (environ 200 millions de dollars), sachant par ailleurs que le groupe Véolia s’y intéresserait également.Il existe également environ cinquante très petites entreprises, créées et gérées par… [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
By the way, the social-science evidence that there are compelling educational benefits that outweigh the costs is underwhelming, as discussed in the amicus briefs filed in Fisher by Abigail Thernstrom et al., Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor, Jr., Gail Heriot et al., the Pacific Legal Foundation et al., (including my organization), and a group of economics and statistics scholars. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
Baker III et al., Football v. [read post]
