Search for: "Martinez v. Connecticut"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 11:24 am
Martinez, N.M. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am
., U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:32 am
Connecticut? [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:30 am
Battaglia, 10-75 (held since 11/23/10, probably for CSX) Rivera-Martinez v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
(Connecticut v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Shanks v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:26 am
” The Hartford Courant has a report on a Connecticut eminent domain dispute between a developer and the city of Branford. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:33 am
Martinez, 106 Conn. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am
Martinez, a religion-and-education case set to be argued next month. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 7:24 pm
I wonder how such a challenge would play out in Connecticut. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 7:12 am
Martinez ("The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying Enrique Martinez, the defendant, a continuance to secure the services of counsel of his choice in violation of his rights under the sixth amendment to the federal constitution. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:05 am
And here is an example of creative judging, by contrast to the decision issued the same day by the Appellate Division, 1st Department, in Debra H. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 2:13 pm
Since the Connecticut Supreme Court (Kerrigan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:04 pm
The panel divided, 3-2, on the rationale for upholding the Civil Service Department's decision, with a majority voicing total agreement with the 4th Department's ruling in Martinez v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 9:34 am
" Godfrey v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
On February 1, a unanimous five-judge panel of the New York State Appellate Division, Fourth Department, which is based in Buffalo, ruled in Martinez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:28 pm
Although that case was settled by the parties and no further ruling was required, the 2nd Department panel granted a motion by the teacher's lawyers to vacate the trial court's decision, citing the Martinez case and implicitly agreeing with its holding, including the Martinez court's conclusion that the 2006 decision by the Court of Appeals in Hernandez v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 8:18 pm
Supreme court case was DOE v PUBLIC SAFETYSmith v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 9:39 am
The case is Martinez v. [read post]
