Search for: "Martinez v. Fuerte" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2018, 11:48 am by Immigration Prof
Guest blogger: Norah Cunningham, law student, University of San Francisco “Hands-on-the-Hips” Arguments: Replacing Legal Reasoning with an Underlying Rhetoric of Fear and Criminalization In my Legal Research, Writing and Analysis class, my professor cautioned my class of fresh-faced 1Ls against... [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 9:53 am
A roadblock for general crime control was prohibited by Edmond; but a roadblock for specific purposes, such as sobriety in Sitz, or securing the border in Martinez-Fuerte, was permitted. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:49 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976); United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:23 pm by Orin Kerr
Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976), the Court considered the reasonableness of an immigration checkpoint set up along a highway. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 7:19 am
McFayden, 865 F.2d at 1311-12 (citing Prouse, 440 U.S. at 662; Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. at 558-59; Brown, 443 U.S. at 51). [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:32 pm by Shaw Drake
In 1976, the Supreme Court decided in U.S. v Martinez-Fuerte that Border Patrol may operate checkpoints and stop vehicles, without a warrant, for brief questioning of their immigration status even if they have no particularized suspicion of unlawful activity or immigration status. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 8:51 am
Martinez-Fuerte, in which the Supreme Court permitted suspicionless routine stops of vehicles at checkpoints on major roads leading away from the Mexican border — even quite far from the border. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 7:11 pm
Such a limit is necessitated by the Fourth Amendment's key principle of reasonableness and the Supreme Court's analysis in Martinez-Fuerte. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 6:51 am by Staff Writer
Martinez-Fuerte, which examined the legality of such stops in light of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]