Search for: "Martinez-Martinez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 41 - 60
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2009, 8:00 am
Culliver (09-158) - originally Conference 11.6 [involves lawyers from Akin Gump and Howe & Russell] United States Defense Department v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
United States, 13-983, and Martinez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
Fans of IFP petitions, do not despair: Martinez v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:47 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 7:25 am
United States (1944), which had allowed the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
For the reasons hereinafter stated, we AFFIRM that decision. 07a0124p.06 2007/04/05 Cress v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:07 am
(relisted after the February 21, February 28, March 7, and March 21 Conferences) Martinez v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
If you were to ask the average citizen what values define the United States, the answer would likely include the right to speak freely without fear of government censorship and a general commitment to a free press. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
The Court also relisted, for a ninth time, Martinez v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
A subsequent state habeas petition from Cook, 10-9742, was then put on hold for Martinez v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:33 am
Daniel Scott Crow, case number 22-cr-14035) and Fernandes (United States of America v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:52 am
Just for kicks, here’s a piece from Justice Lewis Powell’s majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
These facts convince us that the "wrongful and injury-causing conduct ... that provides the foundation for the claim" (Martinez v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
A federal judge struck down Justice Department policies that made it harder for victims of violence to seek asylum in the United States. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:06 pm
P.D.V-G., Appellant, v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
In any event, what he said in his supposed disclaimer was that his prior post was a `complete satire’ and that he was merely engaging `in an exercise of whether free speech still exists in America. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Bazarsky, The Future of PennsylvaniaProducts Liability as Applied by Federal and State Courts: Covell v. [read post]
