Search for: "Masimo Corporation" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2020, 8:40 pm by Scott McKeown
Masimo Corporation, IPR2020-01019, Paper 12 (Dec. 1, 2020) (precedential as to § II.A) (here) In addressing the Fintiv factors, Sotera explains that the petitioner’s broad stipulation not to pursue in district court any ground that it raised, or could have raised, in the inter partes review weighs strongly in favor of institution. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
Masimo Corporation, 109 USPQ2d 1696 (TTAB 2014) [precedential] [TTABlogged here], concerning a Section 18 petition to restrict a color registration for red to a particular shade or red.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 11:44 am by Kevin C. Ford, Trial Lawyer
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, whose opinions are binding on Federal and State Courts in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, recently affirmed the holding of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama to the extent that plaintiffs failed to establish that participation in a clinical study caused any injuries due to the negligence of the defendants (the physician who designed and conducted the study, Internal Review Board who approved the study, and Masimo… [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:32 am
Ahmad testified that he chose the name in 2004-2005 after checking corporate records and the USPTO databases. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 10:55 pm by Steve Baird
Masimo Corporation, John defeated a motion to dismiss his petition for partial cancellation of a prior and blocking single color mark registration under Section 18 of the Lanham Act. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:26 am
Covidien LP v.Masimo Corporation, Cancellation No. 92057336 (January 17, 2014) [not precedential].Covidiens's application to register the color pink (Pantone PMS 806)) for medical connectors and lead wires, was refused under Section 2(d) in view of Masimo's Supplemental registration for the color "red" for patient monitoring sensors and cables. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 3:30 am by John L. Welch
In re Masimo Corporation, Application No. 85041477 (September 30, 2013) [not precedential].According to applicant Masimo, the combination of RAINBOW and 4D is incongruous because the term 4D is not associated with the word RAINBOW. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:52 am by Broc Romanek
Say-on-Pay: Now 61 Failures Last week, Masimo Corporation became the 61st company to fail its say-on-pay in '13 - see the Form 8-K - with 48% support (the company failed last year with only 37% support). [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:30 am by John L. Welch
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.July 17, 2013 - 11 AM: McDonald's Corporation v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 11:32 am by Stacy
In the matter of Masimo Corporation v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:19 pm by John L. Welch
In re Masimo Corporation, Serial No. 77869629 (April 17, 2012) [not precedential].Masimo's primary argument was that resposable "does not appear in the dictionary. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:56 am by Sonya Hubbard
It wouldn’t surprise us if the people holding the strongest opinions about Masimo Corporation (MASI) – a medical technology company with a $1.3 billion market cap based in Irvine, California – fall into one of two camps. [read post]