Search for: "Massey v. USA" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am by Howard Knopf
In the past, many have observed anecdotally and cynically that even after many years of deliberation and millions of dollars in legal and expert fees often expended, the tariff at the end of the day has often the simple arithmetical average of the amounts proposed by the proponent and opponent(s) +/– a few percent.However, that pattern, if it was ever true, has been changing and  the Board has issued some surprising and encouraging decision. in recent yearsThe Board has refused to set… [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
McEloney sued Stephanie Massey over nine posts she put on a Facebook site called “Poms in Perth”. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
Ken Paulson of the First Amendment Center has an op-ed in USA Today about Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 8:09 am by Jenny Egan
 But Think Progress notes that at least four members of the current Court may have a contrary view; in last year’s decision in Caperton v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am by Kedar
Summum – Denied 3-Dec Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
Organon USA, Inc., 2007 WL 4365312 (D.N.J. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:47 am
NY Times (and this editorial) Washington Post Wall Street Journal (and see this editorial LA Times National Law Journal USA Today Dahlia Lithwick (Slate) Guy Charles (responding to Rick Pildes) BNA ($) My thoughts on the case are here.... [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:46 pm
The important article contains these statistics: "A USA TODAY/Gallup Poll this month found 89% of those surveyed believe the influence of campaign contributions on judges' rulings is a problem, and 52% deem it a 'major' problem. [read post]