Search for: "Materials Innovations, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 1,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2021, 7:27 am by Cinthia Macie
’s completed acquisition of GRAIL Inc. on Tuesday by urging an FTC administrative law judge to undo the $7.1 billion deal, arguing it would harm innovation and boost prices of cancer-screening tests. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:20 am by Docket Navigator
Zappos IP Inc., 1-13-cv-01029 (DED November 13, 2013, Order) (Andrews, J.) [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., 489 U.S. 141 (1989). [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 10:27 pm by John L. Welch
Sleep Innovations, Inc., Cancellation No. 92054201 (May 13, 2013) [precedential].Exclusion of Evidence: Petitioner Dan Foam obtained certain documents from a third-party via subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
  Mr Hegglin was therefore engaged in a very expensive and ineffective game of “whack-a-mole” and wanted Google’s assistance to block the material either as the material was posted or shortly after notification. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:29 am
Innovative Therapies v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 2:07 pm
How do I compare the management capability of integrated library systems (example: Innovative Interfaces, Inc.) with digital collection systems (example: ContentDM)? [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 7:20 pm
 The order denied summary determination motions filed by Complainant Saxon Innovations, LLC (“Saxon”) and Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLP (collectively, “Samsung”) in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Handheld Wireless Communications Devices (Inv. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The metal words describe the material of the replica, and “bullet” describes the shape. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
  This principle could certainly apply to innovator manufacturers as well in circumstances where the manufacturer could not make the proposed changes without government assistance.Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. [read post]