Search for: "Matrixx Initiatives, IncĀ " Results 1 - 20 of 148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm by admin
Supreme Nonsense on Differential Etiology In 2011, the Supreme Court addressed differential etiology in a case, Matrixx Initiatives, in stunningly irrelevant and errant dicta. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
Risk assessments would seemingly be about assessing risks, but they are not. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), appealed a Ninth Circuit ruling that the Frye rule survived, and was incorporated into, the enactment of a statutory evidentiary rule, Rule 702. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
“Then time will tell just who fellAnd who’s been left behind”                   Dylan, “Most Likely You Go Your Way” (1966)   When the Daubert case headed to the Supreme Court, it had 22 amicus briefs in tow. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:09 pm by Kevin LaCroix
He points out that two recent Supreme Court cases — Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:53 am by Schachtman
The Circuit rejected Harkonen’s contention that the Supreme Court had announced a new rule with respect to statistical significance, in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 8:22 am by Schachtman
Siracusano: Part I” (Aug. 19, 2011), and “The Transposition Fallacy in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 11:10 am by Schachtman
Gastwirth, “Statistical considerations support the Supreme Court’s decision in Matrixx Initiatives v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:46 pm by Schachtman
Griffis helpfully narrates the Supreme Court’s evolution in Daubert and then in Joiner, but he fails to address the serious mischief and devolution introduced by the Court’s opinion in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 9:07 am by Schachtman
In 1965, Sir Austin Bradford Hill was appropriately elected to the President of the Royal Society of Medicine. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:51 pm by Schachtman
Courts are generally suspicious of convicted defendants who challenge the competency of their trial counsel on any grounds that might reflect strategic trial decisions. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am by Schachtman
Citing the dictum in Matrixx Initiatives[2] as though it were a holding is not only ethically dubious, but also ignores the legal and judicial context of the Court’s statements[3]. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm by Schachtman
When the Supreme Court delivered its decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:35 pm by Barry Barnett
Ct. 2459 (2014); Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]