Search for: "Mattel Inc"
Results 121 - 140
of 506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2012, 1:13 pm
To uphold the registration would allow Mattel to obtain an unfair competitive advantage". [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb Inc., 585 F. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 10:00 pm
MGA Entm't Inc., 2:12-cv-05654-DOC-RNB (C.D. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:51 pm
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
In DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:29 am
Inc., 2011 WL 8427612 (C.D. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576, 585 (2008), created some uncertainty regarding the continued viability of the manifest disregard doctrine, we have concluded that “manifest disregard remains a valid ground for vacating arbitration awards. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:57 pm
Northland Family Planning Clinic, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
Svcs., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 5:14 am
Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008) “either... [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:43 am
Hasbro, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:43 am
Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm
Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576, 584, 128 S. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm
Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576, 584, 128 S. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:20 am
Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:08 am
Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008), the Supreme Court stated that “[w]e now hold that §§ 10 and 11 respectively provide the FAA’s exclusive grounds for expedited vacatur and modification. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 5:34 pm
Mattel has filed its opening brief in the appeal of the $310,000,000 award in Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 12:30 pm
An article by Douglas Wickham of Littler details a recent decision by the Central District of California in Aqua Connect, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
Mattel, Inc. in 2008, there’s been a decided split in the federal courts — and therefore a tremendous amount of confusion – as to whether manifest disregard still exists. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:56 am
Secondly, he remembers that there was a US case between Mattel, the manufacturer of Barbie toys, and MCA Records concerning the song 'Barbie Girl' by Danish group Aqua: Mattel, Inc v MCA Records, Inc, 296 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 2002). [read post]
