Search for: "Matter of Meade"
Results 21 - 40
of 552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2023, 3:17 pm
”[6] The question thus arises: who were those “reputable” dealers, and how does it matter that a private purchaser like White is in good faith? [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 3:23 pm
That is not how prior adjustments to Chevron like the Major Questions Doctrine or Mead have worked; they have applied to preexisting statutes. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
In fact, such conduct is strictly forbidden for federal officials under the Hatch Act and as a matter of Justice Department policy. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 7:13 am
There are three general matters that CEQ might want to address in the prologue. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:43 am
Mead Johnson & Co. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 3:36 am
Mr Justice Marcus Smith found that interest was payable as a matter of principle (it was discussed as a means to discourage hold-out). [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
” At first instance, Meade J held that the Patent was invalid for lack of plausibility and lack of technical contribution over the prior art. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:19 pm
Its policies direct a wind of powerful energy to achieving the Sustainable Development Agenda – which is a human rights agenda – and coherently address the social and environmental issues that matter deeply to every human being on this Earth. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:30 am
Justice Richard Meade. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 4:26 pm
Perhaps their strongest defence was a new one: a statutory defence of “publication of matter in the public interest”. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
” The alternative is to leave such matters to the market. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) will expire at the end of this year unless renewed by Congress. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 6:38 am
On 21 March 2023, Meade J gave a bumper judgment in the revocation action brought by Gilead in respect of two of NuCana’s patents from the same family (EP (UK) 2 955 190 and EP (UK) 3 904 365, the “Patents”), which relate to nucleoside analogues. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:51 am
” Notably, however, while Section 702 limits the matters subject to review by the FISC to the certification and targeting, minimization, and querying procedures used with a Section 702 acquisition, it imposes no strictures on the latitude afforded the FISC in conducting its review. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:14 am
The government can only prosecute statements that are material and made in connection with a federal matter. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
On appeal, Meade J disagreed and upheld the registration. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:47 am
In Optis v Apple, Meade J explained that the date of hand-down itself is not necessarily confidential. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 11:21 am
As a matter of policy, the question is debatable. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
Excluded subject matter Oppo contended that all the claims of the Patent were invalid on the ground of excluded subject matter under s. 1(2)(c) of the Patents Act 1977 (Article 52 EPC). [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
May an agency revive a defunct rulemaking without notice, and then immediately promulgate a lightly revised version of the proposed rule as a final rule? [read post]
