Search for: "Matthew Ryder QC"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
The Ada Lovelace Institute has published an independent review of the UK’s regulation of biometric technologies, authored by Matthew Ryder QC, which found that the UK requires “an ambitious new legislative framework specific to biometrics,” as the current regulatory regime is “fragmented, confused and failing to keep pace. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 1:32 pm
The claimant is represented by Matthew Ryder QC and William Bennett, instructed by Charlotte Harris of Mishcon de Reya. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:57 am
Best wishes from the UKSC Blog Editorial Team 2019: Dan Tench, Emma Cross, Emma Boffey, Rose Falconer & Adam Kosmalski (CMS) and Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matthew Ryder QC, Anthony Fairclough & Emily Campbell (Matrix) [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:30 am
Thus, to the extent that dissent, by reducing legal certainty and predictability, and causing the opinion of the court shift more obviously with changes in personnel, is a negative development (and I am not sure it is, for many of the reasons given by Matthew Ryder QC) and to the extent that current levels of dissent have these effects, then dissent may be a problem for Scots and Northern Irish law than for (say) family law or public law. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
The UK Supreme Court Editors: Dan Tench, Oliver Gayner, Anna Caddick & Laura Coogan (Olswang) Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matthew Ryder & Anthony Fairclough (Matrix) Site Administrator: Anita Davies [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 9:04 am
Editors: Dan Tench, Oliver Gayner, Anna Caddick & Laura Coogan (Olswang) Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matthew Ryder & Anthony Fairclough (Matrix) Administrator: Anita Davies UKSC Blog 2. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
Over 250 concerned professionals signed up to a letter which has been sent to the relevant judiciary including Sir Nicholas Wall, Ryder J, and Senior DJ at the Registry, Philip Waller (I suspect it is not the judges but managers and accountants that need persuading that this is an ill advised plan). [read post]
8 May 2020, 2:32 am
This piece is not about the technical details of the app – there are people far more technologically adept than me who have already written extensively and well about this – and nor is it about the legal details, which have also been covered extensively and well by some real experts (see the Hawktawk blog on data protection, and the opinion of Matthew Ryder QC, Edward Craven, Gayatri Sarathy & Ravi Naik for example) but rather about… [read post]
