Search for: "Matthew S. Snyder"
Results 1 - 20
of 155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
In a letter to the editor entitled “Church did not ruin our goodbye,” Julie Francis, Matthew Snyder’s mother, explains why she refused to join her ex-husband’s suit against the Westboro Baptist Church. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:19 pm
In yesterday’s 8-1 ruling in Snyder v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:26 am
Supreme Court held 8-1 in Snyder v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:55 am
That issue is whatever connection Matthew Snyder had to these matters. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 4:10 am
Fifteen amicus briefs have been filed-- 5 supporting Matthew Snyder's family, 7 supporting Westboro Church's rights, and 3 in support of neither party. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 2:29 pm
The Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision in Snyder v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:13 pm
Simmons & Anton Strezhnev, Human rights and human welfare: looking for a 'dark side' to international human rights law Jack Snyder, Empowering rights through mass movements, religion, and reform parties Leslie Vinjamuri, Human rights backlash Thomas Risse, Human rights in areas of limited statehood: from the spiral model to localization and translation Alexander Cooley & Matthew Schaaf, Grounding the backlash: regional security treaties, counternorms and… [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:00 pm
This is, of course, the funeral picketing case in which intemperate and somewhat bizarre messages of condemnation of homosexuality were displayed near the funeral of Marine L.Cpl Matthew Snyder, killed in action in the Middle East. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
Snyder's father sued... [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
"Matthew Snyder's mother: 'Glad free speech prevailed' in Supreme Court case; She did not support the lawsuit against picketers, and hopes her son will not be connected to 'a vile group of people.'" This article appears today in The York (Pa.) [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:07 am
The brief emphasizes that the protesters involved in the case were complying with all applicable laws and with official directives to stay several hundred feet away from the funeral of fallen Marine Matthew Snyder. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:44 am
The majority found that the Church engaged in speech on public affairs because it critiqued broad policies such as the government’s stance on gays in the military (even though some of its signs did target Matthew Snyder and his family) and because the protest occurred in a “public place adjacent to a public street,” the archetype of a traditional public forum that enjoys special First Amendment protection. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 2:01 pm
Phelps that the First Amendment protected Reverend Fred Phelps's hateful and harmful speech at the funeral of Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder against state tort claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress... [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:04 pm
The court therefore assessed whether Snyder was a “public figure” under Gertz and whether Matthew’s funeral was a “public event. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:15 pm
Albert Snyder, the father of slain Iraq war soldier Matthew Snyder, sued Phelps after he protested at Matthew's funeral. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 10:38 am
However, this time Phelps and his followers protested against the wrong family when they protested the funeral of Snyder's son, Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:17 am
The legal issue is whether the group’s anti-gay protest at the funeral of Corporal Snyder, who died in Iraq in 2006 , is protected First Amendment speech or action for which Snyder’s family can sue for damages. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 1:17 am
Yesterday's Baltimore Sun reports on the opening in Baltimore's federal district court of the trial charging Westboro Baptist Church and its leaders with intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy for the picketing of the funeral of Iraq veteran Matthew Snyder. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:02 am
In Snyder v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:25 am
In the case, Snyder's father claimed that the picketing and a related Internet posting amounted to an invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress. [read post]
