Search for: "Maurice Strong"
Results 61 - 80
of 142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:45 am
Replica of the HMS Bounty, Fall River, Massachusetts (Carol M. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:53 am
Counties that refuse to apply for grants for that purpose would lose all their state support for their local probation departments, which is a pretty darn strong incentive. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
My perspective on legal publishing was validated an early meeting with Maurice Maxwell, of the original Sweet & Maxwell family, who inherited his career as a legal publisher. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:24 am
LEXIS 148614 (W.D.Pa. 2012), and Judge Maurice Cohill Jr. in Spowal v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 2:58 am
Writing in The Guardian, Jeffrey Jowell does, well, he does what he does best – a critique from a strong conception of the rule of law. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 2:58 am
Writing in The Guardian, Jeffrey Jowell does, well, he does what he does best – a critique from a strong conception of the rule of law. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
The Court of Appeal judgment in the case of Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire, (heard 3 April 2012 by Maurice Kay and Hooper LJJ and Henderson J) will be handed down on 19 July 2012. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:50 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum is written by Julian Ku, a Professor of Law at the Maurice A. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
One highly significant and symbolic matter is FDAC: this is an example of a humane, proactive, creative approach which gives parents a real chance but also puts strong, robust pressure on them so if they fail, they fail quickly – which is in the interests of the children. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm
Maurice Kay LJ found that it was, relying primarily on the common law approach, noting that statutes implementing extradition agreements had to be interpreted generously so as to facilitate extradition (at [6]-[14]). [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
It says it will continue to ask for: “…a public interest defence so people can defend themselves unless the claimant can show they have been malicious or reckless; a strong test of harm that strikes out claims unless the claimant can demonstrate serious and substantial harm and they have a real prospect of vindication; a restriction on corporations’ ability to use the libel laws to silence criticism” and provisions for online hosts and intermediaries, who are not… [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am
On 1 February 2012 the Court (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the ruling of Mann J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on PSI ([2012] EWCA Civ 48). [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am
On 1 February 2012 the Court (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the ruling of Mann J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on PSI ([2012] EWCA Civ 48). [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 am
However, he stated there was a “strong public interest in this statutory regime”. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 12:38 pm
Maurice Stucke begins his article "Antitrust and Occupy Wall Street" with a sobering list of economic failures:The crisis in capitalism [recognized even in news sources like the Financial Times] might have come as a shock to some, but not to many middle- and lower-income households. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 12:37 pm
Maurice Stucke begins his article “Antitrust and Occupy Wall Street” with a sobering list of economic failures: The crisis in capitalism [recognized even in news sources like the Financial Times] might have come as a shock to some, but not to many middle- and lower-income households. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:41 am
The Court (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the rulings of Mann J and Vos J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on his privilege against self-incrimination (“PSI”). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am
The Court (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the rulings of Mann J and Vos J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on his privilege against self-incrimination (“PSI”). [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
For example, prolific inventor Maurice Kanbar had a strong35-year relationship with his patentattorney, Mike Ebert. [read post]
