Search for: "Mavrix Photo, Inc."
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
Mavrix Photo, Inc. is one of the leading celebrity photo image companies in the United States with offices in Los Angeles and Miami. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 11:37 am
LiveJournal, Inc. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm
LiveJournal, Inc., No. 8:13-cv-00517-CJC-JPR (C.D. [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:55 am
Oath Inc., 2019 WL 2209206 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:29 am
LiveJournal Inc., No. 14-56596 (9th Cir. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 10:32 am
(citing Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 8:54 am
Some of these photos incorporated either a generic watermark or a Mavrix-specific watermark. [read post]
24 May 2017, 10:16 am
Some of these photos incorporated either a generic watermark or a Mavrix-specific watermark. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
In Mavrix Photo Inc. v Brand Technologies (09-56134) (Ninth Circuit August 8, 2011), embedded below, the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court's dismissal of a copyright infringement lawsuit brought in California against an Ohio celebrity gossip website http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/ by Mavrix, the operator of http://www.mavrixonline.com/. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:47 am
— Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:57 am
Case citation: Sid Avery & Associates, Inc., v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:35 am
In Mavrix Photo Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 5:25 am
* Kindig It Design, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:50 am
ReDigi, Inc., No. 16‐2321 (2d Cir. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am
That affects knowledge standard for secondary liability.Aws Shemmeri ImageRights International, Inc.: LiveJournal decision is a step in the right direction—scrutinize relationships ISPs have w/user communities. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
Google (Copyright Litigation Blog) 9th Circuit: Specific California jurisdiction over Ohio celebrity gossip website publishing Black-Eyed Peas infringing photographs: Mavrix Photo Inc. v Brand Technologies (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Federal Court Nevada: Righthaven rocked, owes $34,000 after ‘fair use’ loss: Righthaven v. [read post]
