Search for: "Mavrix Photographs LLC" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2019, 7:55 am by Eric Goldman
Clarity Digital Group, LLC, ‘if the infringing content has merely gone through a screening or automated process, the [service provider] will generally benefit from the safe harbor’s protection.'” The court distinguished Mavrix because “the defendant there chose a small subset of user submissions to post publicly. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 13 April 2018 Warby J handed down judgment in the cases of NT1 and NT2 v Google LLC. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:15 am by Heather Smith-Carra
This article discusses three separate decisions including Mavrix Photographs LLC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:15 am by Heather Smith-Carra
This article discusses three separate decisions including Mavrix Photographs LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:30 pm
Tibbie McIntyre reports on The 1709 Blog on a number of items, including the declaration of fair use filed by the Andy Warhol estate against Lynn Goldsmith regarding Warhol’s Prince Series; the settlement reached by singer Ed Sheeran and songwriters Martin Harrington and Thomas Leonard in connection with the song ‘Photograph’; the case Mavrix Photographs v LiveJournal, No. 14-56596, which considered whether the safe harbor defense applies to moderators… [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 11:37 am by Carolyn E. Wright
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit opinion in Mavrix Photographs, LLC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 5:25 am by Eric Goldman
This is not enough to show purposeful availment. * Dixie Motors, LLC v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am by Marie Louise
Google (Copyright Litigation Blog) 9th Circuit: Specific California jurisdiction over Ohio celebrity gossip website publishing Black-Eyed Peas infringing photographs: Mavrix Photo Inc. v Brand Technologies (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Federal Court Nevada: Righthaven rocked, owes $34,000 after ‘fair use’ loss: Righthaven v. [read post]