Search for: "May et al v. Halliburton Energy Services Inc"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2013, 9:55 am
In Gonzales et al. v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 4:40 am
Parker et al. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
District Court for the District of New Jersey may further complicate matters. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
And the SEC suggests that supply chain and commodity risks are a primary consideration, by asking for information on the impact of the invasion on energy, raw materials, the “costs and risks associated with transportation,” and “whether and how … products, lines of service … or operations are materially impacted by supply chain disruptions. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
But entities like IV take the view that they are providing a valuable service — they provide inventors with easy access to the economic incentive that fuels invention. [read post]
