Search for: "May v. Department of Corrections et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
’ The judge may also have relied on the affidavit of the plaintiff’s epidemiological expert, Dr. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:14 am
Facts: This case (Nelson v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 1:50 pm
City of Ukiah, et al. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
Circuit court decisions on ADA cases are sparse when compared to the number of suits filed, and cases involving self-service kiosks are rare, so it isn’t surprising the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Davis et al v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:41 am
Delia Guerrero et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
The presumption may be rebutted by persuasive evidence showing that the merger is unlikely to enhance market power. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:26 am
Department of Veterans Affairs, CBCA 7352, et al. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
Planning and Conservation League, et al v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 9:27 am
ART v OHIM (C-171/06 P): It is necessary, in any event, to reject T.I.M.E. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Municipal Law: TaxTransAlta Generation Partnership, et al. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:13 am
This is in line with may prior lines of cases. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Had he, there would be no need for the constitutional crisis that would arise from the interpretation of the law advocated by Tribe, et al. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Note that the petition that the panel just granted was filed by the challengers (Missouri et al.), and argues that the panel erred in finding no First Amendment violation by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the State Department's Global Engagement Center. [* * *] In yesterday's decision in Missouri v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
Burkel, et al., for the CDC v-safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry Team, “Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons,” 384 New Engl. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 2:03 am
In Restaurant Law Center et al. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:39 am
Related Documents Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:55 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a judgment and order in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
