Search for: "May v. Richard et al" Results 61 - 80 of 617
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
”[1] Chair Lina Khan has previously voiced her support for doing so.[2] My view is that the Commission has no such rulemaking powers, and that the scope of the authority asserted would amount to an unconstitutional delegation of power by the Congress.[3] Others have written about those issues, and we can leave them for another day.[4] Professors Richard Pierce and Gus Hurwitz have each written that, if FTC rulemaking is to survive judicial scrutiny, it must apply to conduct that is… [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
   _________________________________   [1] Weston Family Partnership et al v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm by Bill Marler
Contamination occurring in the farm environment may be amplified during fresh-cut produce manufacturing/processing if appropriate preventive controls are not in place. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am by Bill Marler
The vaccine may also help protect household contacts of those with hepatitis A infection. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:38 am by RHP
The conclusion is that the memory of a child may be compromised as result of PTSD. [10]Carrión, G et. al. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Russell Wheeler
It alleged a “vast [four state election] conspiracy;” the magistrate judge dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction O’Rourke et al v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
") After conducting the most thorough judicial review to date of relevant social science on the net public-safety effects of allowing public carriage of guns, Judge Richard Posner in Moore v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:53 pm by Lydia Estep
(EDTX 2017) (patent infringement) and a $2,600,000 verdict in DPX Gear v Prince et al. [read post]