Search for: "Mays v. King County" Results 61 - 80 of 1,396
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2023, 1:01 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The Court defered ruling on the petitioner’s motion to vacate the orders of the Kings County Family Court and requesting temporary custody over B.A.S. during the pendency of these proceedings. [read post]
23 May 2023, 11:00 pm
’”After a Kings County Supreme Court Justice granted the application, and basically ordered that R.G. appear for a deposition by a date certain and, if he failed to do so, that he be precluded “from entering any evidence at trial," an appeal followed.On its independent review of the record, the Appellate Division, Second Department, thought the Supreme Court Justice committed reversible error. [read post]
23 May 2023, 11:00 pm
’”After a Kings County Supreme Court Justice granted the application, and basically ordered that R.G. appear for a deposition by a date certain and, if he failed to do so, that he be precluded “from entering any evidence at trial," an appeal followed.On its independent review of the record, the Appellate Division, Second Department, thought the Supreme Court Justice committed reversible error. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:00 am
FAMILY COURT ERRED BY NOT HOLDING A “FULL AND PLENARY HEARING”After the Kings County Family Court awarded custody of the parties’ child to the mother, the dad appealed.On its review, the Appellate Division, Second Department, agreed that a reversible error had been committed. [read post]
4 May 2023, 8:00 am
COURT COULD DECIDE MOTION, SINCE CASE WAS STILL “ALIVE”Since he owned a piece of property as a tenant-in-common with the defendant, the plaintiff filed suit in the Kings County Supreme Court seeking the appointment of a referee to determine the parties’ rights and to sell the property. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:28 pm by NARF
(Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction; Transfer of Property) King v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:00 am
But the King County Supreme Court rebuffed those arguments, and an appeal ensued.The Appellate Division, Second Department, noted that while a federal-court dismissal for a failure to a state a cause of action would normally have precluded state law claims, in this instance, the Eastern District was quite clear that its determination was “without prejudice” – meaning G.S. could bring a state court action. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:00 am
But the King County Supreme Court rebuffed those arguments, and an appeal ensued.The Appellate Division, Second Department, noted that while a federal-court dismissal for a failure to a state a cause of action would have normally precluded state law claims, in this instance, the Eastern District was quite clear that its determination was “without prejudice” – meaning G.S. could bring a state court action. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Jon May
In his book, The Run of His Life, The People v. [read post]