Search for: "McDonald et al v. Large et al" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2009, 1:55 pm
The petition in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm by Christine Liu
Previous literature largely uses news reports to infer restructuring (see Gilson et al., 1990, among others). [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 3:27 am
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in the consolidated cases of McDonald, et al., and National Rifle Association of America, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
Oral Argument in McDonald v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 4:37 pm by Bill Marler
Fresh produce contaminated during cultivation, harvesting, processing, and distribution has also been a source of hepatitis A (Butot et al., 2008; Calder et al., 2003; Fiore, 2004; Hutin, et al., 1999; Wheeler, et al., 2005). [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
A 2019 epidemiological study has revealed that 9.2% of cattle and 18.2% of beef contain the pathogen.[2] Another recent study has estimated that the Gram-negative bacteria is present in up to 16% of North American cattle.[3] In a 2007 study by Stephens et al., Salmonella was isolated from all of the animals sampled, while Escherichia coli O157:H7 was only isolated from 42.5% of the animals.[4] Notably, 94% of oral cavity samples, 94% of hock samples, 88% of perineum samples, 86% of… [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
First, not all foodborne illnesses are reported to CDC as described by Mead et al (1999). [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
In general, milk-related outbreaks due to E. coli O157:H7 are uncommon, but almost always associated with raw milk products when they occur (Rangel et al, 2005; Hussein et al, 2005). [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Professor Kopel one coauthor a law review article with Professor Moody, and presented an empirical study by Moody in an amicus brief in McDonald v. [read post]