Search for: "McDonald v. Social Security Administration" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2012, 9:34 am by P.J. Blount
by Matt Picciotti This post is part of the student blogger project from the summer session of Space Security Law. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:45 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 She claimed disability via the Social Security Administration stemming from her diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:02 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 She claimed disability via the Social Security Administration stemming from her diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:53 pm by Daniel Richardson
  As part of this program she must account for all payments to the Social Security Administration on a yearly basis. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am by Matthew Kahn
To clarify Fisher’s position, Roberts asks: Is it right that a bank employee who looks up customers’ social security numbers to sell to a third party would not be covered by Section 1030(a)(2)(C) under petitioner’s reading? [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:42 pm by Daniel Richardson
McDonald, 2011 VT 33A lump-sum Social Security Disability Insurance payment made directly to the beneficiary’s children can offset the beneficiary’s child-support arrearages. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:46 am by Melina Padron
Lucy Series gives two social care cases as examples (one of which is McDonald) and highlights fundamental questions which arise from them such as who decides what is dignified? [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:12 pm
By Mike Dorf My latest FindLaw column unpacks a joke made by Justice Scalia during the oral argument last week in McDonald v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:06 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 She claimed disability via the Social Security Administration stemming from her diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:50 am by Frances Rogers
In upholding the trial court’s decision, the Court of Appeal, citing the California Supreme Court decision in McDonald v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am by JB
The Justices rejected the invitation in McDonald v. [read post]