Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp."
Results 61 - 80
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2009, 5:29 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 11:11 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:44 am
Supreme Court to see who will carry the burden of proof in such cases This is known as the “McDonnell Douglass framework” as it came from the Supreme Court’s ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 7:21 pm
(McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
”Affirming the district court’s decision granting CUNY summary judgment on Plaintiff’s retaliation claim, the court explained that under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:33 am
If you have direct evidence, the court can dispense with the well-known McDonnell-Douglas burden-shifting model that helps the court decide if circumstantial evidence is enough to prove your case. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
” Courts test FMLA retaliation claims under the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
” Courts test FMLA retaliation claims under the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 11:54 am
It upheld the lower court decision.The dissent, written by Judge Servitto, referred to a US Supreme Court case McDonnell Douglas Corp v Green, 411 US 792, as a framework for evaluating age-discrimination claims. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:06 am
See, e.g., Graham v Long Island RR, 230 F.3d 34, 40 (2d Cir. 2000); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 1:58 am
Paul Ryan 01/27/2010 Excerpts From Governor Bob McDonnell's Republican Address to the Nation (PDF 15.3 KB)Released by the Office of Gov. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:27 pm
-- Turner v McKesson Corp, Case No. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 9:30 pm
Instead, “[t]he qualifications that are most appropriately considered at step one [of McDonnell Douglas] are those to which objective criteria can be applied . . . . [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 3:21 pm
” The Tenth Circuit noted that some sister circuits have disagreed, but opined that those courts reached the wrong conclusion based on an erroneous interpretation of the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:15 pm
Supreme Court Case of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:30 am
Thus, unlike in a typical case under Title VII involving the burden-shifting method of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:33 am
The court also found that Conitz failed to show the elements of a prima facie case of discrimination under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 10:36 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp. (1978) 87 Cal.App.3d 626, 667-668.) [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 1:42 pm
The First holds that merely being excluded from the management decisions is not enough under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:50 am
The Circuit Court said that Wharff’s disparate treatment claim pursuant to Title VII [42 USC § 2000e et seq.] was to be analyzed under the tripartite burden shifting framework laid out in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
