Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp."
Results 81 - 100
of 178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2016, 6:18 am
Using McDonnell Douglas’s “burden-shifting” approach, the employees argued that the employer’s given reason for terminating their employment—poor performance—was pretextual. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 11:11 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 5:24 am
In previous cases, the Eleventh Circuit had relied on the McDonnell Douglas framework. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:20 am
Lane Construction Corp., January 11, 2016, Jordan, K.). [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 7:15 am
Finally, the justifications MetLife offered for his termination were not a proper basis for rejecting the employee’s prima facie showing because such justifications are only relevant further along in the McDonnell Douglas analysis. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:58 pm
Last month, the OFCCP published in the Federal Register (80 FR 54934-54977) its final rule on regulations to implement Executive Order (EO) 13665 signed by President Obama in April 2014 which prohibits federal contractors from retaliating against employees who choose to discuss their compensation. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:28 am
By Cynthia L. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm
Those decisions, which upheld employers’ affirmative action plans against Title VII challenges, called for application of the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth by the High Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp v Green (3 EPD ¶8607). [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Its analysis was governed by the three-step framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
IDX Systems Corp. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm
Channeling David Spade today. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
Discovery Beyond the Report and the Deposition The lesson of the cases interpreting Rule 26 is that counsel cannot count exclusively upon the report and automatic disclosure requirements to obtain the materials necessary or helpful for cross-examination of statisticians who have created their own analyses. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:17 am
Unisys Corp. and em [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:58 am
”When English-only policies and federal labor law collideBREAKING: McDonnell Douglas lives! [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm
The court, therefore, rejected a per se argument and concluded that a pregnant worker seeking to show disparate treatment must satisfy the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
The Supreme Court’s Holding In its decision, the Supreme Court assessed Young’s disparate-treatment discrimination claim and focused largely on the indirect method of proof under the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp., 721 F. [read post]
24 May 2014, 5:13 pm
La Corte explica que esto viene de "McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:49 am
” The employee fared no better under the McDonnell Douglas framework. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 12:59 pm
Although the court believed Demyanovich had successfully provided direct evidence of retaliation, the court again employed the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework. [read post]
