Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp."
Results 101 - 120
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2014, 7:27 am
Finally, the court pointed out that when the Supreme Court established the elements of a Title VII prima facie case in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, it did not include any element that depended on breaking a contract. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:29 am
A judge or jury must then decide what the real reason for the firing was.The Supreme Court laid out the framework for adjudicating such cases in its 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
24 May 2014, 5:13 pm
La Corte explica que esto viene de "McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp., 721 F. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 3:28 pm
When a court evaluates an employment discrimination claim relying on circumstantial evidence, it will use a burden-shifting analysis that was originally announced in the landmark opinion, McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:31 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp. (1988) 216 Cal.App.3d 388, 421. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 3:40 pm
McDonnell Douglas Corp. (8th Cir. 1993) 990 F.2d 1051, 1057; Kendrick v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 12:48 pm
McDonnell Douglas Corp., 191 F.3d 948 (8th Cir. 1999), that such claims are not allowed. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:49 pm
The Court was guided by the analytical framework articulated by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:40 pm
Schindler Elevator Corp., 113 F.3d 912 (9th Cir. 1996); and Wallis v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 4:10 am
The plaintiff bears the initial burden of presenting a prima facie case and must show he or she is a member of a protected class, was qualified for his job, suffered an adverse employment action, and that others not in the protected class were treated more favorably [McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:08 pm
McDonnell Douglas, Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:16 am
The plaintiff bears the initial burden of presenting a prima facie case and must show he or she is a member of a protected class, was qualified for his job, suffered an adverse employment action, and that others not in the protected class were treated more favorably [McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:46 pm
Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:40 pm
Schindler Elevator Corp., 113 F.3d 912 (9th Cir. 1996); and Wallis v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm
Channeling David Spade today. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:36 am
General Dynamics Corp., (1st Cir. 1998) 144 F3d 151, 161 (under the McDonnell Douglas framework the prima facie burden is quite easy to meet). [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:40 pm
McDonnell, DSc ’06, MBA ’14, former chairman of the board of McDonnell Douglas Corp., were together in the Overseas Press Club in New York City to announce the university’s new global initiative, the McDonnell International Scholars Academy. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:52 am
The case’s origins go back to January 1988, when General Dynamics and McDonnell Douglas Corp. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 12:34 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp., 211 F.3d 457, 463 (8th Cir.2000), but even without a satisfactory explanation, relief may be required where other equitable considerations weigh strongly in favor of setting aside the default judgment. [read post]
