Search for: "Media Products, Inc. v. Doe No. 1" Results 121 - 140 of 976
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
ABC News v Beef Products Inc, “The Pink Slime case” (United States) ABC News and Beef Products Inc. reached a $177m million settlement after the news outlets report in 2012 that the food production company made low-cost processed beef that equated to “pink slime”. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 4:22 am
That case did, however, recite the six factors, citing In re Snowizard, Inc., 129 USPQ2d 1001, 1005 (TTAB 2018) (quoting Converse, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:24 am by gmlevine
“In assessing secondary meaning, one must consider a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, (1) advertising expenditures, (2) consumer … linking [of] the mark to the source, (3) unsolicited media coverage of the product, (4) sales success, … and [(5)] length and exclusivity of the marks use,” citing Paco Sport, Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am by Law Lady
GEORGE BAKER, Appellee. 2nd District.Civil procedure -- Discovery -- Attorney-client privilege -- Trial court departed from essential requirements of law in compelling production of attorney-client privileged documents on basis that documents were relevant and contained information that could not reasonably be obtained from another source -- Unlike the work product doctrine, attorney-client privilege is not defeated by an opponent's showing of relevance and necessityFLORIDA… [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
This is our round up of US freedom of expression and media cases. [read post]
18 May 2021, 11:53 am by Sophia Cope
Snap, Inc. that Section 230 does not protect Snapchat from the parents’ lawsuit. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
United States NPR reports on the so-called “pink slime” libel case between Beef Products Inc and ABC News will take place in a South Dakota state court this week. [read post]