Search for: "Media Products, Inc. v. Does 1 - 64" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
”[1] And today, a small group of some of the world’s most powerful corporations exercise complete control over that public square. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In an important judgment in the case of Duffy v Google Inc  ([2015] SASC 170) Blue J in the South Australian Supreme Court found that Google is legally responsible when its search results link to defamatory content. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
Facebook, Inc., is a social media company headquartered in Menlo Park, California. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
Facebook, Inc., is a social media company headquartered in Menlo Park, California. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
This analysis shows, however, that consumption does not disappear, and that revenue from taxes on tobacco products is rarely used to offset harm caused by that consumption. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
Another excerpt from the First Amendment section of  my Social Media as Common Carriers? [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Vavra, 237 F.R.D. 59, 64 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (citations omitted). [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Production OrdersVice Media Canada Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:43 am by Eric E. Johnson
¶53: HuffPo is unlike other media outlets in that HuffPo selects its content providers and does not allow content from non-vetted providers. [read post]