Search for: "Medicine Express, Inc." Results 121 - 140 of 376
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2015, 11:16 am
Hyland’s Inc., 300 F.R.D. 643, 652 (C.D. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:19 am by J. Dana Stuster
The resolution is non-binding, though a U.N. spokesman described it as expressing the assembly’s “political will. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
After the European Medicines Agency recommended the medicine’s withdrawal, and after the FDA required a new safety study, the plaintiff’s decedent was prescribed 72 Darvocet tablets between January 8, 2010 and May 13, 2010. [read post]
10 May 2020, 9:24 am by Michael Cannan
Of course, what makes a particular medicine good or bad for an individual patient can get very complicated. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 11:12 am by John Duffy
” A professors’ amicus brief written by noted patent attorney Kevin Noonan (who is Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s ex-husband) reminds readers that “[i]nnovation in medicine over the last century is responsible for profound improvements in public health,” and that continued innovation in medicine “depends on the availability of meaningful patent protection. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:42 am
Arnold J. reiterated his view (expressed previously in Teva UK Ltd v Gilead Sciences Inc [2017] EWHC 13 (Pat)) that the test in Lilly remains unclear. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:50 pm by Sean Wajert
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 15-3104, 2015 WL 8538119 (6th Cir. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 12:21 pm by Matt Gluck
The European Medicines Agency, the drug agency for the EU, decided that the vaccine developed by Pfizer Inc. and BioNTech is safe and effective, writes the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:50 pm by Sean Wajert
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 15-3104, 2015 WL 8538119 (6th Cir. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:50 pm by Sean Wajert
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 15-3104, 2015 WL 8538119 (6th Cir. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:05 am by Todd Janzen
The suit, titled Haff Poultry, Inc. v. [read post]