Search for: "Merck & Co." Results 141 - 160 of 1,284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2016, 11:25 am by Tom Lamb
About 4,400 Cases Still Pending In Federal Court MDL As Well As New Jersey And California State Courts   (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)   In their corporate report Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2016, Merck & Co., Inc. provided investors and others with their most recent update about what has been going on (or has not been, as it might seem to be the situation) with the thousands of Fosamax - femur fracture cases filed against the drug company. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 10:00 am
Interesting article in today's Wall Street Journal: Merck Adds U.S., Canada Tax Disputes to Woes; Liabilities in Four Cases Could Total $5.58 Billion, by John Carreyrou Jesse Drucker:Merck Co. disclosed four separate tax disputes in the U.S. and Canada with... [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 6:52 am
Last week, juries returned verdicts in favor of Merck Co., the manufacturer of Vioxx, in two cases involving claims that the drug caused the plaintiff's heart attacks. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 4:10 am
The trend continues, albeit in a nonprecedential opinion, in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 7:18 pm
Building Trades Plan on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated • Defendants: Merck & Co., Inc.; Merck Sharp & Dohme Pharmaceuticals SRL Antitrust action for monopolization of the market for montelukast sodium products (Merck's... [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 7:12 pm
Divided three-judge Third Circuit panel reinstates class action securities fraud complaint against Merck & Co alleging that the company misrepresented the safety profile and commercial viability of Vioxx: You can access today's ruling of the U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 7:37 am
In one of the largest civil settlements in U.S. history, Merck & Co., the New Jersey-based manufacturer of the anti-inflammatory drug Vioxx, recently agreed to pay $4.85 billion to end various Vioxx-related claims in which plaintiffs suffered a heart attack, sudden cardiac death, or stroke. [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 7:18 pm
That jury ruled that Merck & Co., had provided adequate warnings to doctors about the risks of Vioxx and suggested that Merck & Co., did not defraud millions of consumers of the product. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 12:38 am
Merck & Co. is paying claims by the families of more than 3,100 users of its Vioxx painkiller who died of heart attacks or strokes blamed on the drug, according to a law firm administering a $4.85 billion settlement fund. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:07 am by Legal Profession Prof
The New Jersey Appellate Court affirmed the grant of insurance coverage for a cyberattack on Merck On leave to appeal, we consider whether plaintiff Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 1:15 am
Merck & Co., facing more than 850 lawsuits over claims that its osteoporosis drug Fosamax may cause irreversible "jaw rot," won't face punitive damages in the first trial, a federal judge said. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 6:55 pm
On Friday, Merck & Co., Inc. announced that it had agreed to settle thousands of lawsuits filed against the company by patients who took Vioxx and suffered either a heart attack or stroke. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 3:16 am
As of 2004 the FDA asked Merck & Co. to add a suitable warning to its Fosamax label but Merck failed to do so for fear of losing profits associated with the drug. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 3:00 pm
In this products liability claim, the court dismissed an appeal made by the Merck Co., and a jury agreed that Merck and Co. didn’t warn John McDarby about Vioxx’s heart risks. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 2:45 pm
Merck & Co., after long insisting it would never compromise the 27,000 Vioxx cases filed against it, has compromised -- and in a big way. [read post]