Search for: "Michael B Robertson" Results 1 - 20 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm by Ben
 The original MP3.com creator Michael Robertson has lost the action brought against him by EMI who sued the new company and Robertson himself in 2007, claiming that the MP3tunes.com operation infringed its copyrights. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 11:34 am by Westminster Law Library
Law - Gerrard, Michael B., editor Our Common Future – World Commission on Environment and Development Indian Water in the New West, McGuire, Thomas R, et al. eds. [read post]
The Unsuccessful Case Against Michael Robertson Robertson was charged with violating section 105(b) of the Massachusetts General Laws. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:34 am
Robertson who has resigned.Baird was appointed a judge of the Court of Queen’s Bench, Family Division, in 2008. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Right of Access to Justice Under the Rule of Law: Guaranteeing an Effective Remedy Graham Sharp, 3rd year student, University of Saskatchewan College of Law Winner of the 2016 Christine Huglo Robertson Essay Prize. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:00 am by Chris Whytock
A Proposed Solution In our recent Columbia Law Review article, Forum Non Conveniens and the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, 5 Cassandra Burke Robertson and I propose several solutions, two of which I’ll briefly highlight. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am by Marie Louise
Access Copyright (IP Osgoode) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) CIPO Wares and Services Manual contracts again (Trade Mark Blog) Robertson class action settlement #2 decision released: Heather Robertson v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Privy Council will hand down judgment in Baldwin King and Hariette Richardson v Gherson Robertson on Monday 27 October in Court 3 at 11am and will then hear the case of Peerthum v The Independent Commission against Corruption and Anor regarding whether the Prevention of Corruption Act 2002, s 24(5)(b), interferes with the role of the Disciplined Forces Service Commission. [read post]