Search for: "Michael Beebe"
Results 61 - 72
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Jeanne Fromer (& Barton Beebe), The Closing of the Linguistic Frontier in Trademark Law[early in project: more coming soon] Lisa Ramsey, Trademarking Everything? [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 7:07 am
Michael Grynberg’s general thesis about TM law: TM law ignores nonconfused consumers, the other 95%, and we should focus on their goals. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
[discussion of use of design patents to protect shoes] Michael Heller (Columbia Law School) Fashion in academic book conferences: which books get chosen? [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:54 pm
They did not, and I find that very puzzling, because, as Michael Connarty indicated, it was the most radical review of the manner in which the European scrutiny system, which relates to the Government of the United Kingdom in relation to the European issue, was examined by the Committee with responsibility for that issue. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Michael Donaldson, Reflections: More lobbyists in Congress for © industries than there are members of Congress. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
Hosted by Graeme Dinwoodie (DePaul/Oxford) & Mark Janis (Indiana) Session 1: Permissible Uses of Marks: Rationales and Sources of Law. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
Primary Discussants: Michael Grynberg: Grynberg is skeptical that on-the-fly creation of defenses will work—we have a somewhat more textualist Court with respect to treatment of the Lanham Act. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 11:54 am
Dogan: Michael Madow and others have created a rich literature. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
UK media coverage of EU issues is frequently superficial and plagued by basic errors. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Barton Beebe One reason we care about boundaries is that we care about the boundary between unfair competition and IP. [read post]
