Search for: "Michael Long v. US"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2023, 12:37 pm
The lower courts relied on the standard set in Pearson v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:47 pm
The US Supreme Court Thursday announced that investigators have been unable to identify the individual or individuals who leaked a draft of the court’s opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:07 pm
Epona, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:36 am
(For one example, see Illinois v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 7:25 am
by Michael J. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 5:27 pm
At the Originalism Blog, University of San Diego law professor Michael Ramsey has some thoughtful commentary on a recent presentation I gave on the original meaning of public use, which was based on a chapter of a book I am currently working on, tentatively entitled The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 11:25 am
If anything, it’s a little long. [read post]
11 May 2009, 2:27 pm
Michael A. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:24 am
Two pieces in the news worth noting on the issue of secrecy v. transparency in the U.S. intelligence world. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:47 am
At Michaels & Smolak, we have successfully brought sports injury cases, but the facts have to be just right for us to even consider such a case. [read post]
14 Jun 2005, 9:57 pm
No, not the Michael Jackson verdict. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 5:50 pm
And unless the recent arguably clearly incorrect decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Province of Alberta v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:33 am
Doyle Hodges examined whether we should trust the military to protect us from the revival of torture based on the current legal landscape, and General Michael Hayden and Ben explained the special responsibility advocates of strong national security measures have. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 12:30 pm
Michael B. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) (allowing race to be one of several factors to be considered as criteria in college admission, but prohibiting the use of specific quotas). [9] See, e.g., Gratz v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:17 am
By Michael F. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:46 pm
KunYesterday, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Coito v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:28 am
United States, where the US Attorney stretched a long way to prosecute a case as federal. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 3:28 pm
This looks like a strategy that could work for the long haul. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 10:50 am
And if he ends the conversation about counsel, as Michael Simons does here, by responding to a detective's question "Do you wanna continue talking to us? [read post]
