Search for: "Michael V. Fair" Results 121 - 140 of 3,060
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
It's based on amicus briefs that Michael Dorf (Cornell), Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern), and I filed in past cases (and that I blogged about before), but it elaborates somewhat further on that argument. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 8:29 pm by Aaron Moss
In one particularly fulsome analysis of copyright and rhythm, a Louisiana district court in Batiste v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Always be fair and courteous to fellow employees, suppliers and people who work on behalf of the Bank. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:59 pm by Michael Douglas
In Yin v Wu [2023] VSCA 130, the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria set aside a judgment[1] which had affirmed the enforcement a Chinese judgment by an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court.[2] This was a rare instance of an Australian court considering the defence to enforcement of a foreign judgment on the basis that the judgment debtor was denied natural justice—or procedural fairness—before the foreign court. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
The most striking example is provided by the balancing test announced in Mathews v. [read post]
There has also been previous FCA enforcement in this area, see for instance FCA v Barnett Michael Alexander (2011) and FCA v Corrada Abbattista (2022). [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:46 am by Paige Collings
Announcing the settlement, the government explained that Facebook’s algorithms violated federal fair housing laws. [read post]