Search for: "Michael et al v. Thompson et al" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2020, 11:09 am by Eugene Volokh
American Bar Association et al. could have led to discrimination against disabled law school faculty. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 11:09 am by Eugene Volokh
American Bar Association et al. could have led to discrimination against disabled law school faculty. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
” Like the story of another one of my clients by Michael Moss, “The Burger that Shattered Her Life,” I smell another Pulitzer Prize. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark Most readers are undoubtedly familiar with the concept of “insider trading” – that is, the purchase or sale by company insiders of their personal holdings in company shares based on material non-public information. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
I am happy to report the publication of my article,  "The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View From International Law and Standards," Lewis & CLark Law Review 21(4):881-920 (2018). [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:07 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Dictor, who represented many of those employees in a lawsuit against Melngailis (Coltelli et al v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2017)I have just posted a preliminary draft of an article that is currently entitled The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View from International Law and Standards. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 3:40 pm by Schachtman
In a radio interview, Evangelical Michael Huckabee argued that the Kentucky civil clerk who refused to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple was as justified in defying an unjust court decision as people are justified in disregarding Dred Scott v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:14 pm by Michael J. Petro
Thompson, et al., No. 14-1316   In considering four consolidated cases, the Court of Appeals held that district court’s must consider the § 3553(a) factors when imposing all non-mandatory conditions of supervised release, including standard conditions of supervised release. [read post]