Search for: "Michel v. Holder et al" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
These included efforts by the proposed user to obtain authorization from the rights holder within a reasonable period of time – a requirement that may be waived by a WTO member during national emergencies or other circumstances of extreme urgency, which were undefined. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 7:45 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Google et al. concerning the ""free"" use of images - that is the IP side of this case rather than the possible "surveillance" issueClearview is an artificial intelligence company that uses scrapes images online to create a facial recognition database. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Remaking the DMCA in such a way would shift almost the entire burden and cost of enforcement from copyright holders to OSPs. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
Remaking the DMCA in such a way would shift almost the entire burden and cost of enforcement from copyright holders to OSPs. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
  She was a career trial attorney in the Division between 1997 and 2006 [overlapping Jamie Gorelick and Eric Holder’s respective terms as Deputy Attorney General and Bill Baer’s term as head of the FTC Competition Bureau], during the last four years of which she served as the Chief of the Networks and Technology Section. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Thus, for instance, Cao, et al., Willingness to Shoot: Public Attitudes Toward Defensive Gun Use, 27 Am. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
The Association For Molecular Pathology et al v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
Hewlett-Packard Company v Acceleron LLC - Federal Circuit says ‘declaratory judgment jurisdiction’ even if patent holder’s notice avoids phrases like ‘infringement’ and ‘assertion’ (Patents4Life) Except as provided elsewhere, or trumped, I’ll own all the IP – Delaware Chancery Court reminds of risks of wholesale incorporation by reference between separate IP agreements and judicial misreading of patent law: Cepahlon v… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]