Search for: "Michigan v. Fisher" Results 21 - 40 of 257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2009, 7:52 am
The Court approved police entry into a dwelling under the "emergency aid" exception to the warrant requirement in Michigan v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 10:01 am by constitutional lawblogger
Even as we await the United States Supreme Court's opinion on the constitutionality of a university's affirmative action plan in Fisher v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
Fisher’s lawyers had taken her constitutional challenge to the Supreme Court, arguing that the university had not justified the race-conscious part of its admissions plan that it adopted in the wake of the 2003 decision by the Justices in a University of Michigan Law School case (Grutter v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 7:12 am
 It also summarily reversed and remanded the petition Michigan v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 9:39 am by Eric Lipman
Colb's post is an extension of her column posted at FindLaw, in which she criticizes the Supreme Court's decision in Michigan v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:38 am
On Thursday, August 20, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court  granted a motion for reconsideration in McCormick v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:04 pm by HR Hero
What the Court said The Court noted that unlike its 2013 decision in Fisher v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:35 am by Bruce Khula
  This blog observed at the time that the en banc ruling may “offer the Supreme Court an opportunity to revisit a doctrine not at issue in [the Supreme Court's current affirmative action case, Fisher v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:16 pm by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) In general, I am not a fan of the “diversity” rationale for affirmative action, and I have considerable sympathy for plaintiffs’ position in Fisher v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:00 am by Kristina Araya
In Fisher Sand and Gravel Co v Neal A Sweebe, Inc, No. 297156, Judge Owens authored the majority opinion in this case of first impression, holding that the plaintiff’s claim for payment on an open account relating to the sale of goods was barred by the four year limitations period in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 5:20 pm by Amy Howe
  First up is likely to be a challenge to the constitutionality of affirmative action, Fisher v. [read post]