Search for: "Mike Framer"
Results 41 - 60
of 166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2015, 6:00 am
Mike Paulsen: The last chapter was truly the hardest to write! [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm
(Mike points to Justice Thomas’s 2011 dissent in Brown v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 8:50 am
I recommend Michael Gerhardt’s recent WaPo piece on how impeachment was meant by the Framers as a last resort, but I also feel compelled to remind everyone of a few relevant historical facts Mike didn’t mention. [read post]
28 May 2011, 10:55 am
It seems pretty clear from this (and other aspects of the 76 Act) that the framers wanted the statute to remain flexible in terms of what counted as a work of authorship. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 2:35 pm
In fact, Mike, John and I all employ values to choose our particular versions of originalism. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 2:49 pm
In Nashville, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivered a “speech” that was — for all intents and purposes — a Christian sermon. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “a group of hip-hop stars, including Chance the Rapper, Meek Mill, Killer Mike, Yo Gotti, Fat Joe and 21 Savage,” filed a brief yesterday “urg[ing] the Supreme Court to hear their fellow rapper’s First Amendment challenge to his conviction” “for threatening police officers — in a song. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:23 am
"Framers intent" originalism asked how the framers would have decided a case now before the court, which is actually a thought experiment, not a historical question. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm
By Mike Dorf (Below is a slightly amended version of the original post, modified to clarify my argument in response to a private email.) [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 2:12 pm
I refer to the exchange between Mary Sarah Bilder in the historians’ corner and John McGinnis and Mike Ramsey for the originalists. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 9:57 am
An interesting post by Mike Dorf asks what kind of originalism this was. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 3:53 pm
Lash's article responds to recent publications by Will Baude and Mike Paulsen, Mark Graber, Gerard Magliocca, and others. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 11:17 am
MADIGAN: Oh, I'm sorry.Q (Off mike) -- abusing the AG authority.MS. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:44 am
Rick’s attempt came in response to lawprof Mike Dorf’s effort: Mike Dorf has an interesting post exploring whether and why monuments to slave-owning framers like Washington are more morally acceptable than monuments celebrating Robert E. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:14 am
” 1 Now, whether the combination of Neil Diamond, Nirvana, Willow Smith, Devo 2 and others is the type of progress the Framers were considering is subject to varied interpretation. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 3:59 pm
And Mike Huckabee recently called the 17th Amendment “one of the dumbest things we did. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:11 am
This is what Mike Rappaport labels the third possible interpretation of the opinion. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am
Sending Mike Mussina to the dreaded Yankees was the final straw for me, and at that point I became a Red Sox fan–for reasons too complicated to go into here. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 1:03 pm
The Framers provided in the Constitution’s Article I that Congress could, “by cession of particular states,” control a small area in which the federal government would operate. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
I could, however, point readers to this recent and fascinating article in the Cornell Law Review arguing that the Framers WERE very much concerned about combating corruption. [read post]
