Search for: "Mike Mazzone"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
(And as Mike and I argue in our brief, that simple holding is enough to resolve the case, without the need even to reach the question of severability.) [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 7:25 am
At First One @ One First, Mike Sacks examines how higher-education affirmative action issues might play out in the Roberts Court over the next several years. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
The relevant text of the Seventeenth Amendment reads as follows: [Section 2]: When vacancies happen in the representation of any state in the Senate, the executive authority of such state shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, that the legislature of any state may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.Two of us, Amar and Mazzone, wrote two essays (Part One and Part… [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:54 am
Jason Mazzone asserts that the Ninth Circuit's decision yesterday in Perry v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Mike Pence would have become President and named a new Vice President (subject to congressional approval). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 4:40 pm
Techdirt’s Mike Masnick brilliantly gutted it, and I’m not going to pile on – a tour de force requires no augmentation. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 4:40 pm
Techdirt’s Mike Masnick brilliantly gutted it, and I’m not going to pile on – a tour de force requires no augmentation. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:54 am
” At the BLT, Mike Scarcella reports on a recent decision by the D.C. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 10:35 am
Mike Sacks of First One @ One First talks to retired Justice John Paul Stevens. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
At the very least, don’t the expressed views of five Justices that these powers are insufficient create something that is, as fellow Verdict columnist Mike Dorf put it in an amicus brief co-authored with Marty Lederman, “for all practical purposes precedential”? [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
In the first four parts of our series on the California v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:23 pm
I have not had the chance to read the transcripts yet, but Jason Mazzone argues that his reading of the transcripts does not jibe with Sacks's account (although Jason admits the transcript does not reveal angry staring from the bench). [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:24 am
” In the New York Times, Adam Liptak discusses the book review, as does Mike Dorf of Dorf on Law. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
(Anticipated, indeed: Mike Sacks of First One @ One First reports that the line for the Snyder argument began forming Monday evening.) [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
FCPA Professor was started by Mike Koehler who began the blog while teaching at a business school before joining the faculty at Southern Illinois law school. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
Professor Jason Mazzone describes the brief as "eye-popping and game-changing. [read post]
