Search for: "Mike Merit" Results 61 - 80 of 1,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2011, 6:52 am by Matt Osenga
Tom Coburn (OK), Jim DeMint (SC), Ron Johnson (WI), Mike Lee (UT), and Rand Paul (KY). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 9:08 pm
 Perhaps 1 is a question about the scope of jurisdiction and 2 is a question about the merits--so that wider jurisdiction is okay if there's a narrower merits rule, but that a broader merits rule would open the floodgates if the jurisdiction rule were too broad.) [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:22 am by Howard Wasserman
Mike Dorf has established a tradition of posting his Fed Courts exam after the fact. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 5:00 am by Christine Hurt
  The second assumption Velikonja makes which I believe merits further discussion (perhaps even in a separate paper) is the assumption that the decision to commit accounting fraud is a calculated one. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 7:00 am by Nathaniel Grow
In the spirit of a little good-natured debate, and because I ultimately come out differently on the merits of the issue, I thought I'd take the time to offer a few counter-arguments to Mike's thoughtful commentary yesterday regarding the legality of the Bowl Championship Series.To begin, though, I agree with a lot of what Mike wrote. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 8:46 pm
Beaty, Jr. rightly declined to do so.Meanwhile, back in Durham Superior Court, Judge Howard Manning ruled that Mike Pressler could continue his claims against Duke and University spokesman John Burness. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 6:41 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Links: En Banc Brief of Amici Curiae National Whistleblower Center, Mike German, Robert Kobus, Jane Turner and Frederic Whitehurst. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 5:11 am by Howard Wasserman
Mike Dorf has a nice a take on this decision--he calls it legally and morally correct, but still wrong. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm
 Yet delaying merits adjudication would potentially lead to the waste of billions of public and private dollars, and so there is a strong practical imperative for the Court to reach the merits. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 1:11 pm
This sort of dynamic charting has been around for a while but hasn't yet found its way into the mainstream; still, I think there might well be some merit here in applying this sort of relationship mapping to a body of law. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 7:38 am by Steve Baird
One of the examples Mike Masnick over at Techdirt has highlighted is a TTAB case we handled for a Monster Cable victim a few years back, reported here, with pleadings here. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:08 pm
 Everyone agrees that Judge Reinhardt is likely to be quite sympathetic to the plaintiffs' case on the merits. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:01 pm
By Mike Dorf Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Bond v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 7:28 pm
By Mike Dorf In my latest FindLaw column, I discuss the cert grant in Bond v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:14 am by MBettman
  Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine’s office will argue for Ohio. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 7:03 pm
That argument might be wrong on the merits. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 7:14 pm
Supreme Court for fashioning standing rules and other justiciability doctrines that prevent courts from deciding the merits. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:55 am
By Mike Dorf Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued a temporary stay of the plans of the district court in the case challenging California's Prop 8 to make video of the proceedings available online in real time. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 3:51 pm
Wes also thought it worth mentioning that he and Mike Dimino are both colleagues and friends who typically debate each other for the students' amusement. [read post]