Search for: "Milan Express Company, Incorporated" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2009, 10:54 am
  In a statement released on February 2, Google expressed sympathy for the victim’s family, but insisted that “We feel that bringing this case to court is totally wrong. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am by Marie Louise
Easton Enterprises (Patently-O) (IPBiz) (Reexamination Alert) District Court E D Texas: Jury verdict against Johnson & Johnson & Cordis of $482 million in case brought by Saffran (EDTexweblog.com) District Court N D Oklahoma: Tribal sovereign immunity shields Indian nation from liability for patent infringement: Specialty House of Creation, Incorporated v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am by Jelle Hoekstra
It was submitted that the company, incorporated under Liechtenstein law, was permitted to use any of the names "Aktiengesellschaft" (or "AG") and "Limited" (or "Ltd"), that it had been migrated to Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and registered there under the name "Tenaris Connections Limited", and that the registration neither created a new legal entity nor affected the identity or continuity of the company as previously… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
There is no expressive element deserving copyright protection in each listing. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:49 am by Matthias Weller
Stefania Bariatti (Professor at the University of Milan; Of Counsel, Chiometi Studio Legale, Milan) presented the most important cases on the EIR decided in 2016 by the CJEU, as well as some cases still pending. [read post]