Search for: "Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc. " Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2017, 9:58 pm by Patent Docs
The Federal Circuit reversed these decisions earlier this week in an opinion styled Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 9:20 pm by Patent Docs
Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 9:14 pm by Patent Docs
Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:00 am by SECLaw Staff
He also traded on other confidential information in 2009 and 2010, purchasing call options in the securities of Arena Pharmaceutical, Inc., and AMAG Pharmaceutical, Inc., respectively, when the firms were engaged in confidential discussions on business transactions with Takeda. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 8:27 am by Mark Summerfield
In the second decision, a request by joint applicants Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for an extension of time to file a request for examination under the former law, predating the Raising the Bar reforms, has been refused. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by Patent Docs
Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 10:00 pm
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:49 am by Lisa Baird
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., that takes an issue the government has fought in the past – off-label promotion – and attempts to provide a link between it and the false claims issues that relators bring under the government’s name. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Johnson & Johnson Medtronic Merck Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Here, there was no evidence that anyone "foresaw, or expected, or would have intended, the reaction between bortezomib and mannitol, or that the resulting ester would have the long-sought properties and advantages" and hence the invention was non-obvious.link: http://www.patentdocs.org/2017/07/millennium-pharmaceuticals-inc-v-sandoz-inc-fed-cir-2017.htmlIPBiz notes that obviousness relates to that which is known or reasonably foreseeable. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 9:00 am by George M. Gould
In a recent decision of the CAFC entitled Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:32 am
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 2:09-cv-03010 (E.D. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 2:32 am
The Coalition for Patent Fairness was well-prepared for the introduction of the patent reform bill on April 18, 2007. 3M is a member of the Coalition for 21st Century Patent Reform, which includes some pharma companies (eg, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman-La Roche, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Millennium Pharmaceuticals).BusinessWeek noted that the Biotechnology Industry Organization [BIO] has expressed opposition to several aspects of the bill.One notes that… [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:13 am
Millennium Pharmaceuticals LLC, Opposition No. 91228995 [Opposition to registration of the mark 1 POINT for "Business administration of patient reimbursement program; Business administration of medication reimbursement programs; Providing insurance information and insurance reimbursement information; providing financial assistance for prescription cost; Providing medical and scientific research information to patients relating to the management of hematological malignancies,… [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 10:23 am by Sean Wajert
Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al., No. 2:09-cv-03010 (E.D. [read post]