Search for: "Miller v. Houston" Results 21 - 40 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2013, 5:29 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Labor Department files suit to restore losses to the Miller’s Health Systems Employee Stock Ownership Plan Bank or other plan trustees and fiduciaries of Employee Stock Ownership Plans or other employee benefit plans holding company stock, sponsoring employers and their management should heed the new Perez v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:42 pm
The Court’s “Wrongful Life” Decision from 2002 in the Boston Newspaper The Boston Globe has an article titled “When Science Meets the Soul” that includes a brief mention of the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 6:52 pm
If Batson requires us to leave that juror on the panel, but Witt says we should remove her, Mark's case won't be over for a long time. ______________ Resources: In his Miller-El v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 6:59 am
State from the 14th Court of Appeals  in Houston. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:33 am
A lot of contracts, such as the franchise agreement at the heart of Miller v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:41 pm by Ilya Somin
In its unanimous decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
That dubious point was rebutted well enough at the hearings by EFF-Austin board member Matt Henry (see his column in the Houston Chronicle) who compared the situation to US v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 2:20 pm
On Monday, April 16, the Court will hear argument in Powerex Corp. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Marissa Miller
” Briefly: At the Washington Post, columnist George Will urges the Court to hold unconstitutional life-without-parole sentences for juveniles in Miller v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:38 am by Walter Olson
Ronald Miller and Max Kennerly] When lawyer-pundits consent to chase cameras [Scott Greenfield] Lawyer dad sues middle school girls over Facebook video [Houston Chronicle] So-called Precautionary Principle slipping into Restatement (Third) of Torts? [read post]