Search for: "Miller v. Little et al" Results 1 - 20 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2009, 2:00 am
Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. of America, et. al. held that, despite language in the General Contractor's contract allowing setoff for obligations based upon "any other contract or agreement," Miller Act claims are not subject to setoff based on non federal projects. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am by Christopher G. Hill
  In Dickson v Forney Enterprises, Inc. et. al., the Court looked at the question of whether costs of a project manager’s purely clerical duties can be included and correspondingly whether performing those duties can extend the relevant one-year limitations period for filing suit. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:16 pm by Christopher G. Hill
Here at Construction Law Musings, we are quite fond of the Federal Miller Act and it’s Virginia counterpart, the “LittleMiller Act. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:28 am by Christopher G. Hill
Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. of America, et. al. held that, despite language in the General Contractor’s contract allowing set-off for obligations based upon “any other contract or agreement,” Miller Act claims are not subject to setoff based on non federal projects. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 10:15 am by Christopher G. Hill
Beamon, et. al. in the Portsmouth, VA Circuit Court and recently got a great opinion (.pdf) right on point that was recently featured in Virginia Lawyers Weekly. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:05 pm
 The case is Graham County Soil & Water District, et al., v. [read post]