Search for: "Miller v. State of Indiana"
Results 81 - 100
of 262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2016, 1:38 pm
Louisiana, a six-to-three decision that the Court has jurisdiction to decide whether its 2012 decision in Miller v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:58 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:20 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 7:30 am
Scholtens v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
District Court for the Northern District of Indiana: U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
Because both ask whether Miller v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
But in 1997, in City of Boerne v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Davis asks the now-familiar question whether Miller v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Such state laws are often called Religious Freedom Restoration Acts, or RFRAs—named and patterned after the federal RRFA adopted by Congress after the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 10:24 am
United States and Grupo Dataflux v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:06 pm
In October 2013, the state of Indiana filed Indiana v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
Property Damage Appraisers Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
In one notable example, Miller v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:47 am
About a year later, he sued the company in state court. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Rothrock v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:38 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
